// February 22nd, 2010 // View Comments // Bible Study, Mark's stuff
By Jesse Jenkins
Benchley, January 24, 2010
- The doctrine does get very complicated, but it is based on three major points:
- Covenental transition
- The resurrection occurred in A.D. 70.
- The second coming of Christ occurred when He came in judgment of Israel in A.D. 70.
- Covenantal transition
- This view is based upon a misunderstanding of Hebrews 8:13: “In that he saith, a new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready (“eggus”) to vanish away.”
- What was ready to vanish away?
- God had cancelled the Old Covenant as acceptable service, but it had not vanished away as the Jews were still practicing it.
- When Hebrews was written, it was ready to vanish away so that no one could practice it.
- The resurrection occurred at A.D. 70.
- They are not speaking of a bodily resurrection; they do not even believe in a bodily resurrection.
- They believe in “a resurrection from sin-death via the completion of covenantal transformation.”
- They believe that when the righteous dies, his body goes to the grace and that is the end of the body and that his spirit goes to be with God in an unclothed upon state.
- II Corinthians 5:1-4; Philippians 3:20-21; I Corinthians 15:12-20
- The second coming of Christ
- They take passages like Matthew 24:34 and Hebrews 10:37 which refer to the destruction of Jerusalem and conclude there will be no other coming of Christ.
- It should be easily understood that the coming that was “at hand” was not the coming that was not “at hand” in II Thessalonians 2:2.
- If those who were dead in Christ are those resurrected from sin-death, there is no difference between them and the saints who are alive (I Thessalonians 4:16-17).
- Ten “comings” of Christ
- There are at least ten different ways in which Christ is described as coming.